Everest News

Back to News

TAKING STOCK: Growth leads to prosperity

Author: Rishi Singh Category: Mountain May 6, 2007 Everest, Nepal

Kathmandu:With the right policies prosperity can come to Nepal in little more than a generation. You don’t believe me? Let’s take a look at the recent economic history of the world.During World War II

TAKING STOCK: Growth leads to prosperity With the right policies prosperity can come to Nepal in little more than a generation. You don’t believe me? Let’s take a look at the recent economic history of the world. During World War II, Germany, Italy and Japan attacked and devastated half of the world’s economies. By the end of the War the combined allied forces had destroyed Germany and Italy. Japan stood vanquished; two of its cities flattened by the first and only use of nuclear weapons ever. Countries which were economically free achieved higher rates of growth than countries which were stifled by government regulations and taxes. The annual growth rates varied from negative, zero or India’s two per cent (dubbed the Hindu rate of growth) to 5-10 per cent achieved by countries like Germany, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong. The results were startling. Small differences in annual growth rates resulted in immense differences in per capita incomes with the passage of years. We have the spectacle of countries starting at the same point after World War II but after five decades the differences are stark: starving North Korea vs a prosperous South which can afford to and did hold the Football World Cup; East Germany ceased to exist and was taken over by Europe’s powerhouse West Germany; India, Bangladesh and Nepal remain mired in poverty while Thailand and Malaysia raced ahead and substantially eliminated poverty; Singapore and Hong Kong came from behind and overtook in per capita income the older established countries like the UK, Australia and Canada. What accounts for these differences? Differential rates of growth result in vast differences in wealth over time. Let us take a hypothetical example: Suppose, from 2007 to 2037 ie over the next 30 years, Nepal, follows a high growth path: free trade, low taxes, small government, secure property rights, stable monetary policy and achieves a galloping 12 per cent annual increase in its per capita income. During the same period let’s assume Bangladesh is caught in a straitjacket of government controls and its per capita income crawls at just two per cent per annum: Let’s see what happens; We see that Nepalis become almost 30 times as rich as they are today while people in Bangladesh remain poor. This will happen even though Bangladesh’s per capita income is higher today than Nepal’s. By 2037 Nepal’s would be 10 times higher. This is what happened in the past and accounts for the difference in wealth of people in different countries. Let us compare Argentina and Japan. In 1960, Argentina’s per capita income of $3,690 was higher than Japan’s $2,967. By 1990, ie 30 years later, Japan’s per capita income at $14,926 was 3.7 times higher than Argentina’s US$4,083. Argentina with its fertile lands, natural resources and a low population density of only 13 persons per sq-km stagnated (annual growth rate averaged 0.34 per cent) under the heavy hand of its all-powerful government. Japan with almost no natural resources and a population density of 335 people per sq-km (26 times higher than Argentina) but with a relatively open economy, a strong convertible currency and secure property rights grew at 5.53 per cent annually, overtook Argentina in no time, and was the world’s envy up to the 1980’s. Ultimately even a country which grows at one per c ent per year will become rich, but it has to wait a very long time. Nepal at one per cent growth rate would achieve Switzerland’s per capita income of $34,000 in 497 years, while the same wealth would be every Nepali’s in just 64 years at a growth rate of eight per cent. So what will actually happen? Will Nepal grow at one per cent, eight per cent or 12 per cent? Will Nepal eliminate poverty in a few years, or will it take decades or centuries? No one knows, but the policies laid down today by the government of Nepal will impact the future prosperity and growth of every citizen. Low taxes, freedom of exchange, competitive open markets, and monetary stability are the bedrock of economic prosperity. Nobel laureate, economist, and advisor to US presidents, Milton Friedman said, “Economic freedom leads to wealth creation” and proved it. (The writer can be contacted at: everest@mos.com.np) Nepal’s per capita income yearly growth 12 per cent 2007 (at present) $241 2037 (hypothetical) $7220 Bangladesh’s per capita income yearly growth 2 per cent 2007 (at present) $395 2037 (hypothetical) $715

Weather Update: Favorable climbing conditions

Peak Altitude: 8848 m

Risk Level: Low

Expedition Info: First ascent expedition

Mountaineering Himalayas Nepal Adventure Sports Everest First
Stay connected with Mount Everest updates on social media